My Evidence Matters
On Demand's Misconduct / Warnings
Please click on the red hearts to view the Court Documents
After I tried to go viral in August of 2015, On Demand who owned the trademark for CloudPets filed a lawsuit against me.
On September 30, 2015, I Counter-sued On Demand Direct Response, LLC, On Demand and Direct Response III, LLC.
In January of 2016, On Demand's Local Counsel and Lead Counsel filed motions to withdraw for failure to be paid.
On September 8, 2017, Cantor Colburn, LLP (On Demand's Lead Counsel) files Lawsuit against On Demand
In April of 2016, Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Ferenbach that all of On Demand's claims against me should be
dismissed with prejudice (Dkt 161)
In May of 2016, Judge Du Issued an Order Accepting Magistrate Judge Ferenbach's Report and Recommendation and DISMISSED all of
On Demand's claims against me (Dkt 171)
In April of 2018, Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Koppe
recommending a Default Judgement against On Demand
and for On Demand to be Held in Contempt of Court (Dkt 341)
"In this case, Ms. McCart-Pollak has explained that the missing discovery is not only important with respect to her counterclaims involving On Demand, but is also important with respect to her pending claims against third-party defendant Harrington."
In June of 2018, Judge Du Issued an Order Accepting and Adopting Magistrate Judge Koppe's Report and Recommendation (Dkt 362)
"Because On Demands responses to discovery requests at issue are needed for McCart-Pollak to prosecute her third-party claims, the court will wield its civil contempt power to compel On Demand to respond to the discovery request. Accordingly, the court finds On Demand and Miller are in contempt of court orders."
On Demand and Miller Held in Contempt of Court
Court issued a Default Judgement against On Demand (Dkt 363)
In December of 2018, Minute Order in Chambers ...The Court has reviewed the sealed Order signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro in 2:18-mj-17 (ECF No. 2.) Attorney Jeffrey Anthony Miller is terminated as counsel. (Dkt 400)
Lawyer for On Demand
In January of 2019, Jeffrey Miller (On Demands Lawyer and Vice President of Operations for On Demand) is DISBARRED
In June of 2019, Order and Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Foley to find On Demand and Jeffrey Miller in
Further Contempt (Dkt 456)
In August of 2019, Judge Du Issued an Order Accepting and Adopting Magistrate Judge Foley's Report and Recommendation . Finds Spiral Toys in Contempt (ordered to pay $18.81) and Finds On Demand in Further Contempt (ordered to pay $50.00) (Dkt 465)
Spiral Toys and On Demand NEVER PAID the Court Order
In August of 2019, The Court entered Judgment against On Demand for $537,097.92 (Dkt 466)
On Demand NEVER PAID the Judgment
and is no longer located at their business address
On Demand also NEVER produced a single document
that was requested in Discovery
If, in your opinion, you believe that My Evidence Matters and that The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals should REMAND this case back to the District Court, for a Jury to decide at Trial
Please Share.
Keep Going ... There is More to the Story
go to the next page of the website by clicking on the "Lots of Love Buddies" Logo below
Case Law which supports the Right to a Jury Trial
(Withholding and/ or Suppressing Documents, Seventh Amendment, Light Most Favorable, Credibility, and Faulty Recollection)
Please click on the Soldier hugging his daughter below to
view the Case Law Page
Thank you for taking the time to view my website My Evidence Matters.
The mission of this website is NOT to defame anyone or to say that anyone is guilty.
(That determination lies solely in the province of a jury at trial.)
The sole purpose of the website is that
I believe, in my honest opinion, that My Evidence Matters
and that My 7th Amendment Right to a Jury Trial has been violated.