My Evidence Matters

On Demand's  Misconduct / Warnings

Please click on the red hearts to view the Court Documents

After I tried to go viral in August of 2015, On Demand who owned the trademark for CloudPets filed a lawsuit against me.

 

On September 30, 2015, I Counter-sued On Demand Direct Response, LLC, On Demand and  Direct Response III, LLC.  

In January of 2016, On Demand's Local Counsel and Lead Counsel filed motions to withdraw for failure to be paid.

On September 8, 2017, Cantor Colburn, LLP (On Demand's Lead Counsel) files Lawsuit against On Demand 

In April of 2016, Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Ferenbach that all of On Demand's claims against me should be

dismissed with prejudice (Dkt 161)

 

 

In May of 2016, Judge Du Issued an Order Accepting  Magistrate Judge Ferenbach's Report and Recommendation and DISMISSED all of

On Demand's claims against me (Dkt 171)

 

 

In April of 2018, Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Koppe

recommending a Default Judgement against On Demand

and for On Demand to be Held in Contempt of Court (Dkt 341)

"In this case, Ms. McCart-Pollak has explained that the missing discovery is not only important with respect to her counterclaims involving On Demand, but is also important with respect to her pending claims against third-party defendant Harrington."

In June of 2018,  Judge Du  Issued an Order Accepting and Adopting Magistrate Judge Koppe's Report and Recommendation  (Dkt 362)

"Because On Demands responses to discovery requests at issue are needed for McCart-Pollak to prosecute her third-party claims, the court will wield its civil contempt power to compel On Demand to respond to the discovery request.  Accordingly, the court finds On Demand and Miller are in contempt of court orders."

On Demand and Miller Held in Contempt of Court

Court issued a  Default Judgement against On Demand (Dkt 363)

In December of 2018, Minute Order in Chambers ...The Court has reviewed the sealed Order signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro in 2:18-mj-17 (ECF No. 2.)  Attorney Jeffrey Anthony Miller is terminated as counsel. (Dkt 400)

Lawyer for On Demand 

 

In January of 2019, Jeffrey Miller (On Demands Lawyer and Vice President of Operations for On Demand) is  DISBARRED

In June of 2019, Order and Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Foley to find On Demand and Jeffrey Miller in

Further Contempt (Dkt 456)

In August of 2019, Judge Du Issued an Order Accepting and Adopting Magistrate Judge Foley's Report and Recommendation . Finds Spiral Toys in Contempt (ordered to pay $18.81) and Finds On Demand in Further Contempt (ordered to pay $50.00) (Dkt 465)

Spiral Toys and On Demand NEVER PAID the Court Order

 

In August of 2019, The Court entered Judgment against On Demand for $537,097.92 (Dkt 466)

On Demand NEVER PAID the Judgment

and is no longer located at their business address

On Demand also NEVER produced a single document

that was requested in Discovery

 

If, in your opinion, you believe that My Evidence Matters and that The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals  should REMAND this case back to the District Court, for a Jury to decide at Trial

Please Share. 

Keep Going ... There is More to the Story
go to the next page of the website by clicking on the "Lots of Love Buddies" Logo below
Logo.png

Case Law which supports the Right to a Jury Trial

(Withholding and/ or Suppressing Documents, Seventh Amendment, Light Most Favorable, Credibility, and Faulty Recollection)

Please click on the Soldier hugging his daughter below to

view the Case Law Page

soldier.JPG

Thank you for taking the time to view my website My Evidence Matters. 

The mission of this website is NOT to defame anyone or to say that anyone is guilty.

(That determination lies solely in the province of a jury at trial.)

The sole purpose of the website is that

I believe, in my honest opinion, that My Evidence Matters

and that My 7th Amendment Right to a Jury Trial has been violated.